SupplementScience

Our Research Methodology

Evidence-Based Approach

Every claim on SupplementScience is backed by peer-reviewed clinical research. We prioritize evidence in this hierarchy:

  1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses — the highest level of evidence, synthesizing multiple studies
  2. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) — gold standard individual studies with placebo controls
  3. Observational studies — large cohort and cross-sectional studies
  4. Expert consensus and clinical guidelines — professional medical body recommendations

We never cite animal studies or in vitro research as evidence for supplement effectiveness in humans unless clearly labeled as preliminary evidence.

Citation Standards

  • Minimum 3 peer-reviewed sources per ingredient health claim
  • All citations link to PubMed or DOI for verification
  • Study details include: authors, year, sample size, and key findings
  • Conflicts of interest in cited studies are flagged when known
  • Evidence quality is explicitly graded: Strong, Moderate, Emerging, or Preliminary

Expert Review Process

Every article goes through a two-stage review process:

Stage 1: Author

Written by credentialed nutrition researchers with relevant degrees (MS, PhD, RDN). Authors are responsible for accuracy, completeness, and readability.

Stage 2: Medical Review

Reviewed by a licensed physician (MD/DO) for medical accuracy, safety information, drug interaction warnings, and FTC/FDA compliance.

Product Evaluation Criteria

When recommending products, we evaluate across five objective criteria:

  1. Bioavailability — does the product use a well-absorbed form?
  2. Clinical dosage — does the dose match research-backed amounts?
  3. Third-party testing — USP, NSF, or ConsumerLab verification
  4. Ingredient purity — free from unnecessary fillers and additives
  5. Value — cost per serving relative to quality

Product rankings are never influenced by commission rates or brand partnerships. We include non-affiliate budget picks in every comparison to demonstrate objectivity.

Editorial Policy

  • No disease treatment claims — supplements "support" or "may help", never "cure" or "treat"
  • DSHEA compliance for all supplement descriptions
  • Readability target: Grade 8-10 reading level
  • Content refreshed at minimum every 90 days
  • Research pages (30% of content) carry zero affiliate links
  • Negative product reviews included where warranted

Affiliate Disclosure

Some links on this website are affiliate links. When you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This revenue supports our research team and allows us to maintain free, independent supplement analysis.

Our commitment: Product recommendations are based exclusively on our published evaluation criteria. We will never recommend a product that contradicts the evidence presented on our site, regardless of potential commission.

Privacy Policy

We use privacy-respecting analytics (no third-party cookies) to understand how visitors use our content. We do not sell personal data. See our full privacy policy for details.