Our Research Methodology
Evidence-Based Approach
Every claim on SupplementScience is backed by peer-reviewed clinical research. We prioritize evidence in this hierarchy:
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses — the highest level of evidence, synthesizing multiple studies
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) — gold standard individual studies with placebo controls
- Observational studies — large cohort and cross-sectional studies
- Expert consensus and clinical guidelines — professional medical body recommendations
We never cite animal studies or in vitro research as evidence for supplement effectiveness in humans unless clearly labeled as preliminary evidence.
Citation Standards
- Minimum 3 peer-reviewed sources per ingredient health claim
- All citations link to PubMed or DOI for verification
- Study details include: authors, year, sample size, and key findings
- Conflicts of interest in cited studies are flagged when known
- Evidence quality is explicitly graded: Strong, Moderate, Emerging, or Preliminary
Expert Review Process
Every article goes through a two-stage review process:
Stage 1: Author
Written by credentialed nutrition researchers with relevant degrees (MS, PhD, RDN). Authors are responsible for accuracy, completeness, and readability.
Stage 2: Medical Review
Reviewed by a licensed physician (MD/DO) for medical accuracy, safety information, drug interaction warnings, and FTC/FDA compliance.
Product Evaluation Criteria
When recommending products, we evaluate across five objective criteria:
- Bioavailability — does the product use a well-absorbed form?
- Clinical dosage — does the dose match research-backed amounts?
- Third-party testing — USP, NSF, or ConsumerLab verification
- Ingredient purity — free from unnecessary fillers and additives
- Value — cost per serving relative to quality
Product rankings are never influenced by commission rates or brand partnerships. We include non-affiliate budget picks in every comparison to demonstrate objectivity.
Editorial Policy
- No disease treatment claims — supplements "support" or "may help", never "cure" or "treat"
- DSHEA compliance for all supplement descriptions
- Readability target: Grade 8-10 reading level
- Content refreshed at minimum every 90 days
- Research pages (30% of content) carry zero affiliate links
- Negative product reviews included where warranted
Affiliate Disclosure
Some links on this website are affiliate links. When you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This revenue supports our research team and allows us to maintain free, independent supplement analysis.
Our commitment: Product recommendations are based exclusively on our published evaluation criteria. We will never recommend a product that contradicts the evidence presented on our site, regardless of potential commission.
Privacy Policy
We use privacy-respecting analytics (no third-party cookies) to understand how visitors use our content. We do not sell personal data. See our full privacy policy for details.